Free Preliminary Review

Do I Have a Case?

Get an immediate engineering perspective on your construction defect or system failure matter — benchmarked against industry standards and jurisdiction-specific requirements.

Start Your Assessment

What This Assessment Covers

Construction defect and mechanical system failure claims hinge on engineering fundamentals: whether a system failed prematurely, whether the failure is attributable to a specific defect, and whether the evidence supports that conclusion under the applicable standard of proof.

Our preliminary assessment evaluates your matter across three dimensions that determine case viability from an engineering perspective:

Technical Merit

System age relative to ASHRAE expected useful life. Failure-mode consistency with the claimed defect type. Whether the timeline of failure aligns with established engineering patterns for design, installation, or manufacturing defects.

Documentation Strength

Availability of construction documents, maintenance records, inspection reports, and photographic evidence. Whether the physical evidence has been preserved or whether spoliation risk exists due to repairs or replacement.

Jurisdictional Factors

State-specific statutes of limitation and repose. Pre-litigation notice requirements (Arizona right-to-repair, California SB 800, Florida Chapter 558, Texas RCLA). Applicable expert testimony standards — Daubert, Frye, or modified approaches.

What Makes a Strong Construction Defect Case

After three decades of forensic investigations in HVAC, plumbing, and mechanical systems, the cases that succeed share common engineering characteristics. Understanding these factors before retaining an expert helps attorneys allocate resources effectively and set realistic expectations.

Premature Failure Within Useful Life

The strongest cases involve systems that failed well before their expected service life. ASHRAE publishes expected useful-life data for every major building system — from 12–20 years for residential HVAC to 40–70 years for copper piping. A commercial rooftop unit that fails at year 4 tells a fundamentally different engineering story than one that fails at year 22. Our assessment benchmarks your system's age against published industry standards.

Preserved Physical Evidence

The single most important factor in forensic engineering analysis is access to the failed system in its failure condition. Once a system is repaired or replaced, the physical evidence that establishes root cause may be permanently lost. If repairs have already occurred, the case isn't necessarily lost — but the evidentiary path changes significantly. Repair records, pre-repair photographs, and retained components become critical.

Consistent Failure Pattern

Design defects typically present within the first 1–5 years of operation. Installation defects follow a similar timeline. Manufacturing defects often appear earlier — within the first 1–3 years. When the age of failure aligns with the claimed defect category, the engineering narrative is stronger. When it doesn't, an expert needs to explain why, and opposing counsel will challenge that explanation.

Adequate Documentation

Expert testimony is built on evidence. Construction documents establish what was specified. Maintenance records show whether the system was properly maintained. Inspection reports and photographs document the failure condition. The more documentation available, the stronger the foundation for expert opinions — and the harder it is for opposing counsel to challenge methodology under Daubert or Frye.

How We Evaluate Technical Merit

LaRovere Consulting's forensic engineers follow a systematic methodology developed over thousands of investigations. This assessment tool applies the same evaluation framework in abbreviated form — giving you an immediate read on case viability before committing to a formal engagement.

The assessment incorporates ASHRAE equipment life-expectancy data, SMACNA duct construction standards, International Plumbing Code and International Mechanical Code compliance benchmarks, and state-specific building code requirements. It cross-references the reported failure against established failure-mode timelines and evaluates documentation completeness against the evidentiary standards expert testimony demands.

This is not a substitute for a retained expert's investigation. A full forensic engagement includes site inspection, system testing, document analysis, and a formal engineering report. But this preliminary review helps attorneys make an informed decision about whether that investment is warranted for a given matter.

Jurisdiction-Specific Considerations

Construction defect litigation is heavily influenced by state law. The following jurisdictions have specific requirements that affect case strategy and timing:

State SOL Repose Pre-Suit Notice Expert Standard
Arizona2 yr8 yrRequired (ARS §12-1361)Daubert
California4 yr10 yrRequired (SB 800)Daubert
Colorado2 yr6 yrRequired (CRS §13-20-803.5)Modified Daubert
Florida4 yr10 yrRequired (Ch. 558)Daubert
Nevada6 yr10 yrRequired (NRS Ch. 40)Daubert
New York6 yr10 yrNot requiredFrye
North Carolina3 yr6 yrNot requiredDaubert
Ohio2 yr10 yrNot requiredDaubert
Texas2 yr10 yrRequired (RCLA Ch. 27)Daubert
Utah2 yr6 yrRequired (§78B-4-513)Daubert

SOL = Statute of Limitations from discovery. Repose = maximum time from substantial completion. Pre-suit notice requirements vary by claim type; consult legal counsel for applicability to your matter. LaRovere Consulting serves all 50 states — view all service areas.

Start Your Free Assessment

This is a preliminary engineering perspective, not legal advice. No expert-client relationship is created. Formal evaluation requires document review and site inspection. Do not make litigation decisions based solely on this assessment.
1 System
2 Case
3 Evidence
4 Contact

What Happened?

Frequently Asked Questions

How long does the preliminary assessment take?

The initial viability score appears instantly. The detailed engineering assessment typically generates within 15–20 seconds. A copy is also emailed to you for your records.

Is this a formal expert report?

No. This is a preliminary engineering perspective based on limited, self-reported information. A formal expert report requires document review, site inspection, system testing, and engineering analysis conducted by a retained expert under an engagement agreement.

What if my case involves multiple systems?

Submit a separate assessment for each system. Construction defect matters often involve multiple building systems, and the engineering analysis differs for each. You can submit as many assessments as needed.

Is my information kept confidential?

Yes. Information submitted through this tool is used solely to generate your assessment and is treated as confidential business communications. We do not share case information with third parties.

Do you testify nationwide?

Yes. LaRovere Consulting provides expert witness testimony in all 50 states. Our engineers are experienced with Daubert, Frye, and state-specific admissibility standards.

What does it cost to retain an expert?

Expert engagements vary based on scope, complexity, and jurisdiction. Contact us directly at 480-626-2522 to discuss your matter and receive a scope estimate.

My system has already been repaired. Can you still help?

Often, yes — but the evidentiary path changes. Pre-repair photographs, repair records, and retained components become critical. The preliminary assessment will flag spoliation risk and recommend evidence preservation steps specific to your situation.

How is this different from the Submit a Case form?

The Submit a Case form is a general intake for any engagement type. This assessment tool is specifically designed for attorneys evaluating construction defect and system failure matters — it provides an immediate engineering viability analysis before you decide whether to retain an expert.